At least for me, this will provide hours of divertisement.
Here’s what others are saying…the Kossaks anyway. As time permits I will attempt to find some uh, unbiased reactions.
Because reality has that nasty progressive bias, conservatives have again created their own, more comforting version, led by none other than Andrew, House of Schlafly. In response to that bastion of overly tolerant, anti-Americanism called the Wikipedia, we present the Conservapedia, dedicated to insuring that wingnuts young and old maintain their grip on ignorance.
I can’t tell whether the Conservapedia is more Christian or conservative, but I think the former, cause there’s no entry for George Allen, Rick Santorum or Rush Limbaugh. But either way, they might as well call it the Ourshitdoesn’tstinkopedia. Or maybe the LaLaLaLaIcan’thearyoupedia. At any rate, I look forward to appearing as an entry. I would have done it myself but it doesn’t seem to work with the Mac. or maybe it’s just broken…. so somebody please join up and put me in. Just call me seesdifferent. Make up some shit about how I was a missionary or a martyr or a rescued frozen embryo, I don’t care; truth doesn’t matter much, I don’t imagine, as long as you have faith that I am what you say I am. Or write something about dkos: “a motley group of foulmouthed atheists…” you get the idea.
Despite the pathetic nature of this effort, I still find it alarming that conservatives feel a need to create a “conservative version” of the truth. And I have a suggestion for all those who share my alarm. Please, don’t attack Conservapedia. Don’t go over there and play the troll. Instead, take the constructive approach. Go to Wikipedia and locate an article on something you know well, and then improve it. Do your homework, dig up the references, and add to the body of truth at Wikipedia. It is better to light one candle of truth than rage against the darkness.
Let’s look at a few of the evolving definitions:
This entry on Stalin was removed reportedly “out of either shame or embarrassment”
Josef Stalin was an atheist communist Russian dictator during World War II. He was defeated by Adolph Hitler, despite Hitler also being an atheist
The theory is widely accepted within the scientific community despite a lack of any conclusive evidence. …It should be noted that these scientists are largely motivated by a need for grant money in their fields. Therefore, their work can not be considered unbiased. Also, these scientists are mostly liberal atheists, untroubled by the hubris that man can destroy the Earth which God gave him.
A liberal in the early 1800s in Europe was one who favored more powerful elected assemblies. The term was common in France shortly after the French Revolution. Modern liberals are treasonous  and generally hate America .
Are we having fun yet?
Bill Clinton managed to serve two terms without botching the prosecution of two wars, manipulating intelligence, engaging in a systematic program of torture, or mishandling the federal response to flooding of a major American city. Obviously, he is the devil incarnate. Clinton also attempted to use the American military to kill Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, an action which was properly seen as a mere attempt to distract the nation from the Monica Lewisnky scandal.
It should be noted that despite the honorable attempts by the huge Wikipedia community to produce a reliable source of information it is for the most part forbidden to site Wikipedia as a reference. We’ll just have to wait and see which prestigious institutions of higher learning will allow Conservapedia