When I was a kid I loved the prizes we got in cereal boxes. When we opened a box of cereal we would excitedly dig down deep to find the prize. Back then we got cool stuff like Matchbox Cars and Hot Wheels, Army Men, yoyos, puzzles, games, iron-ons, temporary tattoos, action figures and stuff you had to put together. Now days if there is anything at all in the boxes it’s just crap. Nope, prizes just aren’t what they used to be. Just like Nobel Peace Prizes.



#1 by Cliff on October 9, 2009 - 2:29 pm
A big CONGRATS to Obama and the progressive left. though I am a bit troubled by the Republican envy. I suppose the Republicrats are the only ones left in the world who still support the terrorists.
#2 by brewski on October 9, 2009 - 2:40 pm
- Barack Obama
Cliff must think Obama is a Republican suffering from envy.
#3 by Richard Warnick on October 9, 2009 - 3:13 pm
I would suppose that most right-wingers have no love for the majority of Nobel Peace Prize laureates.
Possible exceptions: Henry Kissinger, the Dalai Lama and Andre Sakharov.
#4 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 9, 2009 - 3:15 pm
I wonder if Cindy Sheehan has signed off on the amazing record of Obama since his election.
Once the darling of the peace movement now her loss trodden by the cynical reality foisted onto the American people, ignored, as she she rightly J’accuse Obama for his own deceptions he conducted when he ran for office and the now morass in front of us.
Small wonder he wears the crown humbly and lightly.
#5 by Cliff on October 9, 2009 - 3:18 pm
#6 by Cliff Lyon on October 9, 2009 - 3:22 pm
#7 by Ken on October 9, 2009 - 3:44 pm
I’m with Kanye West on this one. I think Beyoncé deserved it more than Obama.
#8 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 9, 2009 - 3:58 pm
Small wonder he wears the crown humbly and lightly.
#9 by Becky Stauffer on October 9, 2009 - 3:59 pm
First they celebrated that the U.S. didn’t get the Olympics. Now they hate that the U.S. president is a Nobel Prize winner. Why do the Kens of the world hate America?
No need to answer — if it’s anything of a Democrat, they hate it.
Come on, Ken, allow youself some joy.
I’m proud of our president and pleased he has received this honor.
#10 by Ken on October 9, 2009 - 5:12 pm
I haven’t heard anyone angry about him getting the award. We all think it’s a joke. I have a feeling the Nobel Prize people did not do Barack Obama any favors today. As time goes on the ridiculousness of this award will become more and more apparent. If Obama had any humility as he suggests he would respectfully decline but his ego will not allow it.
Becky thank you for your concern. Thankfully my joy has nothing to do with who occupies the White House.
#11 by Weer'd Beard on October 9, 2009 - 5:34 pm
Please Cliff, keep defending Obama’s win! It’s only hurting him, and you!
I’m so damn happy about this!
#12 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 9, 2009 - 6:03 pm
It isn’t celebration. It is a dirge Becky. The guy is so undeserving, and so corrupt…. as to defy description.
W’s 3rd term continues. The war(s), the borrowing, the spending, the no results. The Death.
“Doing the same thing over and over again is the definition of insanity”. Albert Einstein
#13 by Larry Bergan on October 10, 2009 - 12:02 am
Wow Cliff! Thanks for the great list of Obama’s accomplishments. He really has done a lot of great things already. It’s so easy to forget until you see it all in one place!
Clinton had an impressive list that took up a whole newspaper page after his 8 years and all the right wingers had to say is that he didn’t do anything.
Sore losers!
#14 by Ken on October 10, 2009 - 2:58 am
According to Saturday Night Live Obama’s accomplishments have been “Jack” and “Squat”.
#15 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 10, 2009 - 7:10 am
The whole bit. Nice to see that the crew in New York is telling it like it is with a laugh.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/10/05/2089602.aspx
James if you had not noticed, the irrelevancy extends to Democrats. If the have a unstoppable majority in congress and the presidency and STILL cannot cannot accomplish Jack Squat now that is irrelevance.
The representation of the nation is now in uncharted waters. Those in control cannot even keep from consistently soiling themselves. It does have a humor component, then the bodies come home and pile up overseas.
#16 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 10, 2009 - 7:23 am
More stuff to bring O bots down to reality. This award will have repercussions. The view from the “Continent”. Better put on your glasses James and Larry.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6867711.ece
#17 by Becky Stauffer on October 10, 2009 - 7:28 am
Jay,
Not to bring you down from your high, but really what else can we expect from a Rupert Murdoch website/newspaper?
#18 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 10, 2009 - 8:30 am
Murdoch or not the story has its facts, surely Becky support your guy there. The rest of the world has the goods on the guy and his path is no longer going to be easy for him. It happens to all presidents, but with his inexperience and hubris, not to mention incompetence, the next few months will be tough for the guy.
You are the like the Bush 25% Becky. The rest of the people in the nation don’t have this allegiance to the empty suit called Obama.
#19 by brewski on October 10, 2009 - 8:31 am
A lot of people must be reading Murdoch newspapers
- Lech Walesa, Nobel laureate
- Princeton University historian Fred Greenstein
#20 by Becky Stauffer on October 10, 2009 - 8:47 am
Really, Jay? 56% of Americans (UP from September’s 50%) say they approve of the job he’s doing. Under the tough circumstances he’s faced in the past nine months, I’d say that’s mighty good.
But keep up your wishful thinking. You too, Brewski.
As for me, I’m hoping for all our sakes that our president is successful in his endeavors.
#21 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 10, 2009 - 9:30 am
That poll is completely cooked. Wait until 2010 and we will see. Democrats are running away from this president as they face their elections. Yessir that squares with a 56% approval rating.
What is amusing is that Obama is out bushing Bush, and progressives support it. Makes you look unusually gullible. America truly is in deep trouble.
He cannot be successful, besides he doesn’t run anything, he is being run. The inability to see the reality we face dooms any success. It will all be clear soon enough for you.
#22 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 10, 2009 - 9:46 am
Not much for polls, but in most respondents here would be Europeans and here is what they think.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/poll/2009/oct/09/obama-administration-barack-obama
#23 by Larry Bergan on October 10, 2009 - 9:48 am
Becky:
Did you know Rupert Murdock owns controlling interest in The National Geographic Channel:
National Geographic Channel (joint venture with National Geographic Magazine) 67%
So you see, he really does have credibility.
#24 by brewski on October 10, 2009 - 3:24 pm
Cliff, your list is a joke, and you know it.
A speech is not an accomplishment. If moving speeches are the barometer for greatness, then Lou Gehrig should get a Nobel Prize.
See above.
If winning an election is the mark for a Nobel Prize, I guess you think GWB should get two.
Administrative shuffling earns a Nobel Prize?
Wow, appointed an envoy, really he did that all by himself? What next, names blue-ribbon task force and is cannonized?
And shifts secret renditions to Bagram. You’re making this far too easy for me.
See blue-ribbon committee above.
Winning the approval of terrorists and genocidal mass-murderers everywhere.
See Bagram above.
More abortions for all!
But refused to increase gas tax which would surely get people to not want gas guzzlers in the first place.
See blue-ribbon comment above.
Does that mean that GWB gets a Nobel for No Child Left Behind?
Does Orrin Hatch get to share in the $1.4MM prize?
But refuses a carbon tax.
Borrowed $1B more from the Chinese?
I think Whole Foods should get a Nobel for selling MSC certified fish.
Ha! This is the funniest one. He committed to a timetable laid out by Bush which he had previously opposed. As a candidate he had opposed the surge which made the responsible pullout possible. He had also then called for a rapid and irresponsible pullout. How many time can a person be so wrong about the same thing?
So I guess Reagan should get a Nobel too.
Still waiting for Nixon’s Nobel.
And called reckless and spendthrift by leaders of the G20 who rebuffed his demands that they spend more.
You get a Nobel for having dialog with countries you are already friends with?
While Iran gets closer and closer….
Bolstering the dictatorship and keeping thousands of pro-democracy activists in prison.
Borrowing more from China to send to Pakistan.
He developed renewable energy projects? Last time I checked companies develop renewable energy projects while the Kennedys do what they can to stop them.
I am still waiting for the experts on rule of law, governance and economics to explain to me how 200 years of Federal bankruptcy law was tossed out in the Chrysler and GM bankruptcies so that senior secured lenders were made junior to unsecured general creditors who happened to be Obama contributors.
GWB gave speeches many times saying that the US is not at war with Islam.
PRK extorted the US by insisting the Bill Clinton go there and kiss their ass. We did. Ok, fine, but not exactly a diplomatic victory.
So pissing off our central European allies and backing down from the Russians all one one day. Amazing.
#25 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 10, 2009 - 3:51 pm
There won’t be a response to that Brewski. Very workman like. No grandeur, no over the top, just an accounting of all the nothing Obama has done.
Cliff’s “list” is just a prepared talking points of the desperate side that realizes that their hero is really a boob, and will likely take them all down as the multiplicity of crisis take hold.
Comes down to this, you either believe in the goodness and miraculous nature of the mundane exploits of this near president as walking on water…or you live in reality and you don’t.
#26 by Ken on October 10, 2009 - 10:29 pm
I am going to ask Weber State University to immediately award me a diploma even though I have not earned it yet. Since my intention is to do so then that should be good enough using the logic of the Nobel Peace prize committee.
#27 by Cliff Lyon on October 11, 2009 - 8:04 am
Brewski, You MUST be f…ing kidding. GWB could have given that speech a million times. Even if he HAD NOT used the word Crusade, no one would have believed him. For Christ’s sake, Bush couldn’t set foot in Cairo without being killed.
I think the point of giving Obama the Nobel Prize was to send a clear message to Americans that the rest of the world HATES George W. Bush so much, they would have given the prize to ANY successor.
The truth is the Prize was about Bush.
Frankly, the Nobel Peace Prize was simply the most convenient club available to wack the approximately 25% of American Morons who still defend the Fucking Disgrace.
Guess what? The world no longer gives a shit about what Republicans think. The Republican party is done. fucked and finished and disrespected by every decent, educated person in the world.
Let me be really honest. Nobody gives a fuck what Republicans think anymore.
Name me ONE visible active Republican respected by anyone or any country in the WORLD, outside of the tiny minority of American rubes who refuse accept that they have been used.
Seriously, you guys are an international embarrassment.
#28 by brewski on October 11, 2009 - 2:58 pm
- GWB quotes among many others
As for the word “crusade”. GWB admitted the word was the wrong word to use. Most Americans use the word in a meaning not inferred by Muslims.
Yes, exactly, so then you agree then that Obama did not deserve the award for anything he did, since you said they would have given it to anybody. Precisely.
By the way, I have an awful lot of problems with the Republican Party too. There are very few current members of the Republican leadership that I have any respect for. But “very few” is more than none. I would rather have people like McCain and Corker in power than Pelosi and Reid.
I would say that McCain is respected greatly by the Vietnamese for the decades of leadership and outreach he made long before it was fashionable.
I am not sure what you mean by “you guys”, since I don’t speak for the GOP and differ with them on many issues. I know you are a classic loyal partisan hack and you can’t understand that sometimes people think for themselves and don’t have party loyalties. I would and have voted for Democrats who had the right ideas and principles, but I haven’t seen it in a long time and certainly not now. Bob Kerrey was one, if I had lived in Nebraska. Patrick Moynihan, if I had lived in NY. Bobby Kennedy, if I was that old.
#29 by Cliff Lyon on October 11, 2009 - 3:31 pm
Hey Brewski,
You just defended Bush so you DO speak for the GOP.
Please stop bothering us with your self-characterizations.
#30 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 11, 2009 - 4:11 pm
Please like most of your scrip this is completely over the top.
Since the rest of the world is so patently pathetic at leading the world it seems to need America out front. The Committee decided to club OBAMA with the award so as to embarrass him into doing the DAMN THINGS HE PROMISED IN THE ELECTION.
Look at his reaction, he acted like a teen that knocked up the headmasters daughter. Embarrassed. The world knew Bush is an ass, what they wonder know and wait to see is if Obama is one.
#31 by brewski on October 11, 2009 - 5:44 pm
My point was to easily point out your hypocrisy and refute your partisan cheerleading for Obama, not to defend Bush. If accurately quoting Bush did so, then so be it.
#32 by James farmer on October 12, 2009 - 9:47 am
Jay:
The above is obviously one of the more intelligent things you have stated at 1U.
Two take aways: (i) you agree with the world that Bush is/was an ass; (ii) you concede that insufficient time has passed to make that same jugment re Obama.
#33 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 12, 2009 - 11:29 am
That is the benefit of the doubt given to Europeans and the rest of the world, we the American people already know what Obama is. An ass, really Bush’s third term in disguise.
James you seem to unable to comprehend the idea that the “they” referred to in the sentence is Europeans and the rest of the world, not the United States.
#34 by James farmer on October 12, 2009 - 12:44 pm
Jay:
Might I suggest, then, a primer on proper use of the English language?
Regardless, I think you will find your statement wholly divorced from reality. The American people do not agree with your conclusion re “ass.” Indeed, by making such stupid statements, you, yourself, appear as the ass, and a stupid one at that!
#35 by cav on October 12, 2009 - 1:39 pm
Whenever it is said that “We all” or ‘The American People” belive / Think…It is fair to assume tha there’s mischief in statistical presumption afoot.
#36 by Becky on October 12, 2009 - 2:53 pm
I’d have to agree, Cav. And we might also suspect the inclinations of those who say they don’t put much stock in polls and then proceed to quote a poll.
#37 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 12, 2009 - 8:41 pm
Nice James! The equivalent of a “I know you are but what am I”? For adults.
Divorced from reality? You are still in San Francisco right?
The poll effect Becky is simply to show the spectrum. We will all know by the mid term elections. Polls don’t matter. They matter even less and have no influence if you pay no attention to them.
#38 by James farmer on October 13, 2009 - 9:11 am
Jay (Glenn):
Yes, divorced from reality. We, the American people, as you refer, do not think Obama is an “ass.”
While you and various elements of the party-of-no and fail-America may think otherwise, you are but a small, although shrill, segment of the American populace.
Maybe, just maybe, instead of hoping for failure, you could bring yourself to rallying around the president and the country, or at least contributing in some positive fashion.
Lord knows, America has done more for you, Glenn, during your years here than you have done for America. Quit your whining, ass!
#39 by Jay Wurlitzer on October 13, 2009 - 10:36 am
To whom do you refer? This person has really got you going there.
Fuck Obama James. He is liar, and all that I hope for him is all I hoped for the Liar Bush.
Obama is destroying the nation in the same manner Bush did. Keep your notions of what others owe to this country into the spectrum of requirements, as that is all there is. I am a sworn American citizen which means I have MORE obligations than a guy like you. You are a born citizen and a lawyer. Read the Oath of Citzenship sometime.
BTW James what have you ever done for America that is positive other than managing your alcoholism?
Citizens of Oath are obligated to defend the nation and constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. As Obama continues unconstitutional directives from the last administration, he is then a domestic enemy of the constitution.
As you seem to support him pretty much all the way around, then you too James have the similar problem to most Americans.
The sooner Obama fails, the better off we will all be. You want the damn country to resemble Chicago politically?
#40 by Jim Barnstall on October 13, 2009 - 2:56 pm
Here James, this is something that will help you to keep track and organize your thoughts on Obama based on the existing reality. From one Jim to another.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6310255/Barack-Obamas-Top-10-unfulfilled-pledges.html
#41 by James Farmer on October 13, 2009 - 4:58 pm
Jay (Glenn):
There you go with that alcoholism stuff again.
Sure it isn’t you that’s hitting the bottle these days, Glenn? The unbridled anger and wandering gobbledygook in your commentary suggests all is not well.