Except for Rush Limbaugh, ALL the Top Republicans Shills Have Broken Ranks With Mittens Rmoney

We are witnessing the end-days of the GOP. R.I.P.

The question becomes, who will win the final battle; the racist Religious extremists, the racist Tea Baggers or the tired old-guard racist Republicans?

Stay tuned…

, , ,

  1. #1 by Larry Bergan on September 24, 2012 - 7:24 pm

    Please make it be true.

  2. #2 by brewski on September 24, 2012 - 11:40 pm

    Cliff, you threw the R-bomb three times in one sentence. That is a record, even for you. It certainly does confirm what I think of your intellect and ethics. Can’t you ever say anything of substance, ever? Or is R-bomb throwing all you got?

  3. #3 by Cliff Lyon on September 25, 2012 - 5:46 am


    This was no small effort and, I think meets with the highest standard for “substance.” Agreed or disagree?

  4. #4 by brewski on September 25, 2012 - 7:58 am

    And what is the point? That some people are nuts? That it? The same type of piece has been done on lefties as well. So it’s been proven there are nuts on both sides. You want me to bring up Farrakhan quotes? Julian Bond quotes? Biden quotes? Reid quotes? Obama quotes? If this is all you got then you need to try a little harder.


    Listen to that and tell me how all Obama supporters are a bunch of intellectuals.

  5. #5 by brewski on September 25, 2012 - 1:38 pm

  6. #6 by Larry Bergan on September 25, 2012 - 7:01 pm


    Howard Stern strongly supported our invasion of Iraq. He was just as misinformed as these people he edited into his radio show.

    “Fart man” is a fool with a foolish show.

    If we could just get YOU to stop misinforming people to the best of your ability, we’d start to save our democracy.

  7. #7 by Larry Bergan on September 25, 2012 - 7:13 pm

    I like one of “the material girl’s” songs. Sort of like her attitude.

    She warned the crowd she was dizzy.

    What else ya’ got boozeki?

  8. #8 by brewski on September 25, 2012 - 7:45 pm

    What does Howard Stern’s opinion on anything have to do with the ignorance of Obama supporters?

  9. #9 by Larry Bergan on September 25, 2012 - 8:22 pm

    Do you think all of Howard Stearn’s callers are honest. Callers to the show don’t have to show their faces or their names.

    Hannity had a producer called “Flipper” and a cohort, (Alan), who was more then willing to play second fiddle and be treated like trash by anybody who came on the show.

    Maybe they’re just actors. Maybe You’re an actor.

    Do you think the people on “the people’s court” or the other myriad of court shows were so desperate, they were willing to make a mockery out of themselves. What about the people who came on the Jerry Springer or Dr. Phil show.


    Did they or you respond to a want ad seeking actors because they were desperate or because they were so rich, they had plenty of time to make fools out of Americans?

    Did they have to sign an agreement, that they would never disclose they were actors?

    I think these are legitimate questions.

  10. #10 by brewski on September 25, 2012 - 8:59 pm

    Those were not callers. Those people being interviewed who didn’t know shit about anything didn’t even know they were being interviewed by the Stern show. So your whole line of questioning has nothing to do with those people.

  11. #11 by Larry Bergan on September 25, 2012 - 10:09 pm

    So you can give me proof that you or they were not actors?

    Americans elected Bill Clinton, (twice), Al Gore, and Barack Hussein Obama – in that order.

    Nobody disputes that.

    I will always say that George W. Bush’s “election” – both of them – were a fraud and there are many thousands who would stand behind me on that.

    I have a name and you don’t, dude.

  12. #12 by brewski on September 25, 2012 - 11:15 pm

    What is this “proof” crap?

    More people voted against Clinton than for him in BOTH elections. Nobody disputes that.

    Talk to cav.

  13. #13 by Larry Bergan on September 25, 2012 - 11:41 pm

    George H. W. Bush nor Bob Dole ever even came close to contesting their lost elections to Bill Clinton.

    What the “crap” are you trying to say, brewski/dude?

  14. #14 by brewski on September 26, 2012 - 6:33 am

    What I am trying to say is that in both of Clinton’s elections more people voted against him than for him. No one disputes that.

  15. #15 by cav on September 26, 2012 - 8:13 am

    What is this “proof” crap?

    It is for this reason I’m refusing interviews and participation in debates.

  16. #16 by Larry Bergan on September 26, 2012 - 11:29 pm

    Proof in elections these days is non-existent. It has nothing to do with “Chicago politics”.

    It has everything to do with Karl Rove, (election master).

    Can’t prove a thing, but, I think, space/time will decide. 🙂

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: