
The old game show was called “Let’s Make A Deal.” Monty Hall would ask you which door do you want, Door #1, Door #2, or Door #3? Sometimes it worked fine, other times not such a good deal. President Obama should not play this game. Behind Door #1, there is House Speaker John Boehner refusing to consider allowing income taxes to return to the Clinton-era marginal rates – not even for just the top tax bracket. Behind Door #2, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is saying no to any tax increases on anybody, ever – whether by raising rates or eliminating loopholes. Behind Door #3, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor is threatening to take the debt ceiling hostage again.
President Obama has to make a decision, almost immediately, about how to deal with continuing Republican obstruction. How far should he go in accommodating the G.O.P.’s demands?
My answer is, not far at all. Mr. Obama should hang tough, declaring himself willing, if necessary, to hold his ground even at the cost of letting his opponents inflict damage on a still-shaky economy. And this is definitely no time to negotiate a “grand bargain” on the budget that snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.
In saying this, I don’t mean to minimize the very real economic dangers posed by the so-called fiscal cliff that is looming at the end of this year if the two parties can’t reach a deal. Both the Bush-era tax cuts and the Obama administration’s payroll tax cut are set to expire, even as automatic spending cuts in defense and elsewhere kick in thanks to the deal struck after the 2011 confrontation over the debt ceiling. And the looming combination of tax increases and spending cuts looks easily large enough to push America back into recession.
Nobody wants to see that happen. Yet it may happen all the same, and Mr. Obama has to be willing to let it happen if necessary.
Why? Because Republicans are trying, for the third time since he took office, to use economic blackmail to achieve a goal they lack the votes to achieve through the normal legislative process. In particular, they want to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, even though the nation can’t afford to make those tax cuts permanent and the public believes that taxes on the rich should go up — and they’re threatening to block any deal on anything else unless they get their way. So they are, in effect, threatening to tank the economy unless their demands are met.
Mr. Obama essentially surrendered in the face of similar tactics at the end of 2010, extending low taxes on the rich for two more years. He made significant concessions again in 2011, when Republicans threatened to create financial chaos by refusing to raise the debt ceiling. And the current potential crisis is the legacy of those past concessions.
Well, this has to stop — unless we want hostage-taking, the threat of making the nation ungovernable, to become a standard part of our political process.
So what should he do? Just say no, and go over the cliff if necessary.
It’s worth pointing out that the fiscal cliff isn’t really a cliff. It’s not like the debt-ceiling confrontation, where terrible things might well have happened right away if the deadline had been missed. This time, nothing very bad will happen to the economy if agreement isn’t reached until a few weeks or even a few months into 2013. So there’s time to bargain.
More important, however, is the point that a stalemate would hurt Republican backers, corporate donors in particular, every bit as much as it hurt the rest of the country. As the risk of severe economic damage grew, Republicans would face intense pressure to cut a deal after all.
The wealthiest 2 percent of Americans can afford to pay more taxes. As a member of the middle class, I see no problem in letting all the Bush-Obama tax cuts expire. The only way to handle this situation is let the “fiscal cliff” happen, and ignore the debt ceiling (which is unconstitutional anyway). When federal deficits disappear, nobody in Washington can use deficit hysteria to attack Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
What about our economy? The Congressional Budget Office predicts that if the Washington politicians went over the so-called “fiscal cliff,” we would experience a shallow recession and take about a year to recover. The U.S. economy would shrink about 0.5 percent over the year before bouncing back and growing at a rapid clip of 4.3 percent annually between 2014 and 2017.
UPDATE: Obama Calls On Congress To Extend “Middle Class” Tax Cuts Now
Of course, what President Obama is really talking about is extending all the Bush-Obama Tax Cuts For The Rich – except the income tax rate on those making over $250,000 a year. In other words, keeping about 80 percent of the Bush tax cuts.
UPDATE: Bill Kristol: ‘It Won’t Kill The Country If We Raise Taxes’ On Millionaires
UPDATE: Congressional Republicans’ ‘Compromise’: Everyone Should Accept Romney Tax Plan
UPDATE: Fiscal Cliff Scare Talk Follows Shock Doctrine Script
All of the people who had been hysterical about the budget deficit “crisis” are now hysterical that taxes will go up and spending will go down. Go figure. Maybe — just maybe — I shouldn’t even say it — these “serious people” weren’t … serious … when they said they were worried about the deficit.
UPDATE: Obama On Tax Cuts: President Rejects Republican Plan To Close Loopholes
UPDATE: Obama Breaks It To GOP: Tax Rates Are Likely Going Up
“This should not be a surprise to anyone…. The majority of voters agreed with me,” Obama said. “More voters agreed with me on this issue than voted for me.”
UPDATE: Obama Rejects Boehner’s Fake Tax Compromise



#1 by Larry Bergan on November 10, 2012 - 4:11 am
Somebody says:
Taken out of context; to be sure, but I couldn’t tell what you were talking about either.
#2 by Larry Bergan on November 10, 2012 - 4:15 am
New readers are probably having a problem as well.
Think?
Certainly long winded and time consuming.
By design?
#3 by Richard Warnick on November 11, 2012 - 2:21 pm
UPDATE: Bill Kristol: ‘It Won’t Kill The Country If We Raise Taxes’ On Millionaires
#4 by Larry Bergan on November 11, 2012 - 4:38 pm
Bill Kristol wouldn’t have said that if Romney took office. This is change I can believe in.
#5 by cav on November 12, 2012 - 6:40 am
Warren. Are you talking ‘Grand Bargain’ here?
#6 by Richard Warnick on November 12, 2012 - 10:16 am
UPDATE: Congressional Republicans’ ‘Compromise’: Everyone Should Accept Romney Tax Plan
#7 by Richard Warnick on November 14, 2012 - 10:44 am
UPDATE: Fiscal Cliff Scare Talk Follows Shock Doctrine Script
#8 by cav on November 14, 2012 - 11:31 am
Since when are 6% grades cliffs? I’ve seen girl rock climbers hanging from undercuts – no protection and gigantic smiles on their faces.
Let’s not be babies about no little six percent grade just because it’ll mean we have to restructure some of our drone warring, or maybe we’ll only have slots enough for one fewer four-star.
#9 by Richard Warnick on November 14, 2012 - 12:14 pm
I’m reluctant to bring it up, but lately it seems some of our four-star generals haven’t been earning their pay.
#10 by Richard Warnick on November 14, 2012 - 1:13 pm
UPDATE: Obama On Tax Cuts: President Rejects Republican Plan To Close Loopholes
#11 by cav on November 14, 2012 - 1:33 pm
And, of course, it is not a fiscal cliff. It is more a Sword of Damocles. One of their own making. One they could just as easily undo it.
John Boehner, like Paul Ryan Is an utter asshole.
#12 by Richard Warnick on November 14, 2012 - 1:41 pm
Things are looking better all the time. We are finally going to get rid of the Bush tax cuts, at least temporarily until Boehner, McConnell et al. admit they lost the election — which will probably take a few months at the very least!
What’s causing the deficits? I wonder.
#13 by Richard Warnick on November 14, 2012 - 2:30 pm
UPDATE: Obama Breaks It To GOP: Tax Rates Are Likely Going Up
#14 by cav on November 14, 2012 - 2:35 pm
Let the f*cking Bush tax cuts expire as they were initially structured to do – it’s the law for goodness sake. Do not let Obama negotiate on this or we will end up with permanent tax cuts for people earning over $250,000 given his past negotiating skills (or lack thereof). Propose the Obama tax cuts that make the first $60,000 of earned income tax free. Lost revenue can be made up by a sales tax on exotic financial transactions.
#15 by Richard Warnick on November 14, 2012 - 3:12 pm
UPDATE: Obama Rejects Boehner’s Fake Tax Compromise
#16 by Larry Bergan on November 14, 2012 - 3:58 pm
332 to 206 and nearly 3 and a half million popular votes spells “political capital” in my book, (where have I heard that term before)?
Obama is too poised to strut around talking about political capital, but maybe he should.
cav:
Even Bill Gates said he favored a sales tax on those transactions and Warren Buffet had a lot to say about taxing himself too. Time for the Republicans to wake up and stop catering to people who kneel before Grover Norquist – THEMSELVES; every darn one of them – ,But you know how much Republicans hate to admit they were wrong, and we’re talking about decades of wrongness here.
#17 by Glenden Brown on November 14, 2012 - 4:04 pm
The Obama Administration is getting pressure from progressive groups in ways they have never experienced before – progressive groups disappointed by the last four years aren’t taking the president’s support for granted. that’s a good thing.
#18 by Richard Warnick on November 14, 2012 - 4:03 pm
So far, you can’t even get the Republicans to admit they lost the election. Rep. Ryan thinks his ideas are “popular.”
Paul Ryan’s Rapid Rewrite of Election History
#19 by Larry Bergan on November 14, 2012 - 5:10 pm
From Richard’s link, John Nichols writes:
breswki would have loved to rebuke Nichols, but he wouldn’t have, because Nichols made a huge typo in the Republican’s favor. Obama won the Electoral College by an overwhelming 332-206 margin, not 232-206.
#20 by Richard Warnick on November 14, 2012 - 7:22 pm
Democratic House candidates received more votes than Republicans did. The GOP was saved by gerrymandering.
Willard (“Mitt”) Romney: “If you’re looking for free stuff you don’t have to pay for, vote for the other guy.” Nobody gets anything for free in America, but Romney thinks we do because he is totally out of touch.
#21 by cav on November 14, 2012 - 8:28 pm
Now, It’s proper to suggest that feeding the trolls be left to the professionals or not be done at all. Distraction will be the only result.
#22 by Richard Warnick on November 14, 2012 - 9:52 pm
I should have said the middle class and people who work for a living never get anything for free. The rules are different for the rich.
How stupid do you have to be to think that people who have to pay health insurance premiums ever receive “free” health care?
#23 by Larry Bergan on November 14, 2012 - 10:17 pm
Premium is an interesting word. According to some dictionaries it means a prize or award, yet you have to pay more at the gas pump for it. My little Toyota only requires regular gas and I haven’t had a big problem with my car in all the years I’ve owned it.
Could it be that the rich are being scammed by the uber-rich, or is it just the conspicuous consumers showing the rest of us they don’t even have to care.
Class warfare.