The Real Romney: Obama Won Because of ‘Extraordinary Financial Gifts’ to Supporters

Smirking Mitt

Wow. When Willard (“Mitt”) Romney thinks there are no reporters or recording devices, he says what he really thinks.

Now we know that Mitt Romney did not “misspeak” when he whined to a big-money crowd that 47 percent of Americans mooch off government and “believe they are victims.” He meant precisely what he said.

In a post-mortem call with his biggest donors on Wednesday, Mr. Romney said his team ran a “superb” campaign with “no drama” (well, yes, it was a pretty dull campaign) and that he lost because President Obama showered voters with “gifts.” By voters he meant black, Hispanic, female and young voters. And by “gifts,” he meant government money that is not spent on tax breaks and other incentives for big companies and rich people.

“What the president, president’s campaign did was focus on certain members of his base coalition, give them extraordinary financial gifts from the government, and then work very aggressively to turn them out to vote,” Romney said in the afternoon call, according to audio aired on ABC News.

Romney is wrong. We didn’t get “free health care” or anything else for free. Nothing is free for the middle class in America.

But the rich? Their investment banks got billions in interest-free loans from the Federal Reserve. Robert Reich:

The big banks haven’t used the money to refinance mortgages – why should they when they can squeeze more money out of homeowners by keeping them at higher rates? Instead, they’ve used the almost free money to make big bets on derivatives. If the bets continue to go well, the bankers will continue to make a bundle. If the bets sour, well, you know what happens then. Watch your wallets.

Talk about “extraordinary financial gifts from the government.”

UPDATE: Mitt Romney Unbound: Thanks A Lot, Moochers!

UPDATE: Jindal: Romney’s ‘Big Gifts’ Comments ‘Absolutely Wrong’

UPDATE: Fox Uses Romney’s “Gifts” Comments To Push Its “Makers Vs. Takers” Argument

UPDATE: Josh Marshall:

It’s not too much to say that Romney is now uniting the country across party lines that he’s someone who should leave as soon as possible and not say anything publicly again. Actually scratch that. Democrats are starting to think that having Romney around and continuing to dump on a broad range of Americans might be pretty awesome.

  1. #1 by Richard Warnick on November 15, 2012 - 4:36 pm

    UPDATE: Josh Marshall:

    It’s not too much to say that Romney is now uniting the country across party lines that he’s someone who should leave as soon as possible and not say anything publicly again. Actually scratch that. Democrats are starting to think that having Romney around and continuing to dump on a broad range of Americans might be pretty awesome.

  2. #2 by Larry Bergan on November 15, 2012 - 6:31 pm

    I hate to agree with Bobby Jindal, but he’s right. Romney kept demonizing everybody who isn’t rich and it hurt him deeply in the election.

    If he keeps this up, he’ll be as unmentionable as a former president named after a shrub.

    Can’t happen too soon.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: