Paul Krugman today, under the headline The Market Speaks, observed:
So the message from the markets is by no means a happy one. What the markets are clearly saying, however, is that the fears and prejudices that have dominated Washington discussion for years are entirely misguided. And they’re also telling us that the people who have been feeding those fears and peddling those prejudices don’t have a clue about how the economy actually works.
Krugman repeats his usual talking point – ignore short term deficits, get the economy going, then deal with deficits. He tackles the usual Very Serious People who have been wrong about everything for at least 20 years now – the same people who were cheerleading the Iraq war are the same people who are cheerleading fiscal austerity.
No, the important point about these particular bad predictions is that they came from people who constantly invoke the potential wrath of the markets as a reason we must follow their policy advice. Don’t try to cover America’s uninsured, they told us; if you do, you will undermine business confidence and the stock market will tank. Don’t try to reform Wall Street, or even criticize its abuses; you’ll hurt the plutocrats’ feelings, and that will lead to plunging markets. Don’t try to fight unemployment with higher government spending; if you do, interest rates will skyrocket.
And, of course, do slash Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid right away, or the markets will punish you for your presumption.
By the way, I’m not just talking about the hard right; a fair number of self-proclaimed centrists play the same game. For example, two years ago, Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson warned us to expect an attack of the bond vigilantes within, um, two years unless we adopted, you guessed it, Simpson-Bowles.



#1 by Richard Warnick on March 11, 2013 - 3:39 pm
Krugman compares the deficit scolds to high priests of a phony religion, loudly and incessantly demanding that we make human sacrifices of the old, the poor and the sick to appease their nonexistent gods.
Always say “Bowles-Simpson” because the initials are BS.
#2 by brewski on March 11, 2013 - 6:12 pm
Krugman seems to entirely ignore that what the market is telling us is that the Federal Reserve buying three trillion dollars worth of securities is one way to increase prices for both bonds and stocks.
#3 by brewski on March 11, 2013 - 9:31 pm
If you have a point, make it.
Consumer level inflation and asset price bubbles are not the same thing. Krugman’s opinion piece was about the stock market, so I addressed that.
Can you keep up with me for once?
#4 by Richard Warnick on March 11, 2013 - 10:20 pm
Comment deleted. Fake name.