Everything Old Is New Again – Southern States Resisting Integration Again

Apparently, Southern Republicans governors have no shame.

John at Americablog has been following the story.

When the anti-gay Defense of Marriage Act was struck down on June 26, 2013, the Pentagon ordered same-sex spouses to be treated the same as the spouses of heterosexual US service members.  The National Guards in the states mentioned above refused to issue ID cards to the spouses of gay service members, arguing that anti-”gay marriage” laws in the states forbade them from doing so.

These National Guard units are directly defying orders from the Secretary of Defense.  But it gets more interesting:

You see, there’s a little known fact that the National Guard, while split in its administration between the states and the federal government, tends to get the lion’s share of its funding from the feds.

Take Mississippi (please).  The Mississippi National Guard annual report for fiscal year 2011 shows that the state of Mississippi appropriated almost $7.8 million for the state National Guard.  In that same year, the federal government gave the Mississippi National Guard $679 million. In 2012, the figures were similar: $685 million from the feds, $7.2 million from the state of Mississippi.

In other words, Mississippi gets nearly 99% of the budget of its state National Guard from Secretary Hagel, the guy they’re now saying they don’t need.

The folks in South Carolina, who have never been on the right side of any civil issue in American history decided:

 . . . by telling the feds, in essence, that if they want blacks swimming in South Carolina pools, South Carolina will simply shut down the pools altogether, so no one can swim in them. South Carolina is now refusing to issue an ID to anyone, requiring all National Guard families, straight and gay, to go to federal facilities, which are not always nearby.  No word yet on whether South Carolina is going to balk at providing federal marriage benefits to gay couples.

The governor Oklahoma liked that approach so much, she took it a step further:

Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin (R) announced earlier this month that state-owned National Guard facilities will no longer allow any married couples to apply for spousal benefits, regardless of whether they are same-sex or opposite-sex. The Supreme Court’s decision overturning the Defense of Marriage Act means that servicemembers with same-sex spouses are now eligible for federal benefits. Fallin’s unusual tactic is designed to avoid having to recognize those couples, which she asserts would violate Oklahoma’s constitutional amendment limiting marriage to one man and one woman . . .

Oklahoma is not alone in defying Hagel’s orders. The Texas Military Force acknowledged this week that it will not allow same-sex couples to apply for a housing allowance at state-run National Guard facilities, having already turned away at least one couple. Mississippi, Louisiana, and Georgia have also refused to comply, but some states that previously had balked have begun complying, like West Virginia. A total of 29 states have constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage, but most are complying with the federal recognition for purposes of the National Guard.

It’s pretty simple.  The Secretary of Defense has authority over the National Guard.  The Federal Governments funds the national guard.  The actions of these states is nothing more than hostility to gay and lesbian folk.

  1. #1 by Bikerdad on November 23, 2013 - 3:04 am

    The Secretary of Defense has NO controlling authority over the National Guard unless those units are Federalized. The commander of a State’s National Guard is the State Adjutant General, who answers to the Governor.

    Well, which is more important to you, guns or gays? If you say “gays”, then you agree that the Cliff’s argument that the 2nd Amendment is ONLY a collective right is bunk.

(will not be published)


%d bloggers like this: