Safety is not part of “pro-life”

SCOTUS has destroyed the buffer zone that protects women and those escorting them in clinics from protestors. Given the cases of domestic terrorism in USA of the “pro-life” protestors hurting and even killing abortion seekers and providers this seems backwards at best.

Interesting to note that the SCOTUS has a buffer zone.

  1. #1 by Larry Bergan on June 26, 2014 - 7:18 pm

    What should the punishment be, for people who show up at a profoundly bad day for somebody they don’t even know and try to make them feel worse.

    Who in the hell decided to make abortion a political football? Was it Lee Atwater? Shame on whoever goes where they have no business going.

  2. #2 by Shane Smith on June 27, 2014 - 12:11 am

    Larry, they should have to live with brewski…

    • #3 by cav on June 27, 2014 - 9:22 am

      Cruel and unusual. Sorry.

  3. #4 by cav on June 27, 2014 - 12:29 pm

    Cruel and unusual. Sorry

  4. #5 by brewski on June 27, 2014 - 12:40 pm

    Data that painful for you?

    • #6 by Shane Smith on June 27, 2014 - 12:57 pm

      Sorry, did the spambot that quoted the Blaze just say something about data?

      Data that is on topic: http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/violence/history_extreme.html

      • #7 by brewski on June 27, 2014 - 9:31 pm

        proabortion.org? really? and you make fun of other people’s sources?

        [editors note: the failure of the commentator to understand the difference between allowing grown adult human beings the freedom to make their own choices and being pro-abortion is an excellent example of the authoritarian mind set that is currently waging an all out war on the idea that women are human beings. See the links in the left bar for more on the authoritarian mind.]

        The one time I linked the Blaze I had no idea what the Blaze was and had never heard of it. Nevertheless, if the Blaze says 1 + 1 = 2, that does not mean that 1 + 1 = 6.

        [editors note: stay tuned to this blog for more examples on the inability of the posters politically motivated mind to preform smile math.]

        • #8 by Shane on June 29, 2014 - 7:26 am

          Facts hurt you that much?

        • #9 by brewski on June 29, 2014 - 9:57 pm

          [editor’s note: the failure of the commentator to understand the hypocrisy of being in favor of grown adult human beings the freedom to kill viable baby human beings is an excellent example if the self-delusional mindset required to murder other viable human beings]

          [editor’s note: the failure of the commentator to understand the hypocrisy of being in favor of grown adult human beings the freedom to kill viable baby human beings but those same grown adult human beings should be denied the freedom to make their own choices as to whether they want to going a union, which school their children should attend, which customers or clients they choose to sell their personal services, free speech in general, among others, is an excellent example of the liberal-Statist authoritarian mindset that is currently waging a war on the idea that grown adults should have the freedom to make any choices except for killing babies]

  5. #11 by Shane Smith on June 27, 2014 - 2:10 pm

    I also don’t recall the Court being the target of hundreds of arson attacks. I wonder if that would change their point of view?

    How many clinics are in stand your ground states? How many times can “good christians” get shot while yelling obscenities at these women before someone decides that one of these law might have to be adjusted?

  6. #12 by Larry Bergan on June 28, 2014 - 8:46 pm

    I was just wondering…

    Does any other country on earth have endless debates about abortion around election time. I highly doubt it. If this is what makes US exceptional, I’ll pass.

    • #13 by Shane Smith on June 29, 2014 - 7:46 am

      It is debated in other countries, but seldom you get the sort of mindless brewski style mentality where everyone else is wrong and people can’t even read a blog post they simply scan the word “abortion” in the title and immediately post that anyone who actually considers the facts should have been aborted themselves.

      Canada is an interesting example. If I recall, they decided that the restrictions in place where illegal in the 90’s or so and since then any time, any reason covered by healthcare has been the rule. They have a fairly high ranking in number of abortions preformed, but also most likely have nearly all of them reported, since the legality is not an issue. The political parties generally don’t spar over the issue, the only real anti-choice movement is from the Catholic church I believe.

      Try to act shocked.

  7. #14 by Larry Bergan on June 29, 2014 - 9:33 am

    What ticks me off, is that the opposition party – opposed to everything democratic party – doesn’t care if a billion abortions are performed per day, as long as they find a way to stay in power and get rich.

    Am I being skeptical?

    • #15 by Shane Smith on June 29, 2014 - 2:14 pm

      Since abortion rates and abortion laws have a weak correlation at best, but comprehensive sex ed does reduce abortion rates, and they are against that….

      Well, you can connect the dots.

      Though to be fair, there are good studies suggesting that they just don’t understand the correlation between abortion rates and unplanned pregnancies.

  8. #16 by Larry Bergan on June 29, 2014 - 9:50 am

    They probably have people working on a way to classify campaign donations as philanthropy.

  9. #17 by brewski on June 29, 2014 - 9:58 pm

    deleted again by the Statist Authoritarians.

    • #18 by Shane Smith on June 30, 2014 - 7:39 am

      Nothing in the que, maybe the tiny authoritarians in your head are deleting your oh so wise posts and leaving only the BS you normally post…

      • #19 by brewski on July 2, 2014 - 6:52 pm

        hypocrite.

        • #20 by Shane Smith on July 3, 2014 - 4:06 pm

          I wonder, if I posted about 4-6 times a week about how people used bad sources for evidence, and then I used a terrible source, and then admitted that I didn’t even know a single thing about that source, what would I be?

          A brewski?

  10. #21 by Larry Bergan on July 2, 2014 - 7:19 pm

    brewski:

    I’ve been slogging through every spam comment and releasing yours, along with many other commenters here. Stop saying you are being censored. I know you have been censored here, but that was only because a poster thought you were trying to make a mockery out of his posts and didn’t delete your comments from other posters threads.

    Buck up!

    • #22 by brewski on July 3, 2014 - 4:10 am

      Larry, I appreciate your efforts to un-delete my posts. That is quite civilized of you. I wish I could say the same thing for your Authoritarian friends. You are are a true American.

      • #23 by Shane Smith on July 3, 2014 - 4:04 pm

        Your so cute when you stomp your little feet at your imaginary problems…

    • #24 by Richard Warnick on July 3, 2014 - 7:29 am

      Larry, have you used the search function? Helpful if you know the handle of the commenter.

      • #25 by Larry Bergan on July 3, 2014 - 7:32 pm

        I haven’t found a way to put all spam comments on one page. The search function would work under those circumstances, but as it is now, I’ve been having to wait for the next 20 comments to load in. Sometimes there are around 80 pages that have to be scanned for legitimate comments and one of our best commenters is getting tired of not having his comments show up until the next day or so.

  11. #26 by cav on July 3, 2014 - 10:15 am

    Be forewarned, you need no longer look for any of mine. They ain’t in there. I may come in again, but with a new screen name.

    • #27 by Larry Bergan on July 3, 2014 - 7:35 pm

      I wonder if this problem is happening to other WordPress sites. It sucks bad!

(will not be published)


%d bloggers like this: