Posts Tagged Religion

Les Misérables Reaches into the Depths of your Soul

Here is my critique on the film adaptation of Les Misérables  and answer the criticism some are making of the film. First of all it was by far better than the adaptation of Phantom of the Opera and was much better cast and the emotional resonance was so powerful it would require a stone cold heart for it not to affect you on some level. I don’t always tear up in movies, especially where my family is present with a penchant to tease, but this overwhelmed even the risk of some ribbing and the tears flowed freely throughout the movie. I don’t know why the music and themes affect me so much but they always have from the first time I heard the music and the many times I have seen the stage play.

This was an unbelievably difficult task by director Tom Hooper to adapt a stage musical to the screen and not make the movie seem like a stage musical itself but he did it beautifully while remaining faithful to the source material.

The vocals were not perfect but that was the point of the producers to have the actors sing as they acted rather than prerecord the music. It worked with the screen adaptation of The Phantom of the Opera because that music is supposed to be grandiose but with Les Miz the music is supposed to carry an emotional punch that would have been difficult with canned music and probably come across too polished and overly produced.

Hugh Jackman was excellent and gave the needed gravitas and emotional grounding of the movie and masterfully presented the themes such as anger, hate, forgiveness, pain, forgiveness, redemption, and saintliness and gave it a gripping realism. Jackman is Jean Valjean.

Anne Hathaway stole the show and if she does not win an Oscar for her portrayal of Fantine it will be the biggest Oscar travesty since Annie Hall beat out Star Wars for Best Picture. Her performance of “I Dreamed a Dream” carried the emotional weight of Susan Boyle on Britains Got Talent.

Samantha Barks made you root for her to get Marius and her rendition of “On My Own” was nearly as good and heart wrenching as Anne Hathaway’s I Dreamed a Dream.

The two Children who played the young Cossette and Gavroche were outstanding. Some complain about giving Gavroche a Cockney accent but of all the times I have watched the stage version he had a strong British accent and it was probably by design. It is not unusual for Hollywood to give the French British accents. The Gavroche character reminded me a lot of the Artful Dodger in Oliver.

As for the Thénardiers I thought they were perfectly cast and gave the movie its much needed comedy relief. I can’t think of anyone else who fit the roles better than Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter. It appeared to me the director gave them a lot of leeway.

Russel Crowe did much better than I thought he would so he exceeded my expectations. He brought to the part a coldness but also demonstrated the internal conflict Javert felt when Jean Valjean defied his skeptical view of redemption and his absolutist view of justice.

This is one of those few movies I will be able to see over and over again and never tire of it. Once it is out on Blueray it will be a permanent part of my movie collection up there with my favorites such as The Lord of the Rings, Star Wars (originals), Harry Potter and the Hobbit Movies.

, , , , , , ,


Pimping Religion for Power: Okelberries Crusade Withers on the Vine

My final statement in response to the Okelberry Crusade (assault) entitled  Glenn Beck: Hung By the Neck at KVNU
April 17th, 2009 at 09:29


Agreed. We should probably close this thread…after I get a last word.

Okelberries quoted me accurately.

I’m interested in decapitating people who think their religious opinions belong in government.

The operative (dependent) clause here is “who think their religious opinions belong in government.”

I do not speak of religious people, but rather ‘people who…’ I am of course referring to the once powerful moral majority who swept Bush into office and proceeded to invent a new interpretation of the 1st Amendment.

I refer to Republican politicians most of whom were not religious at all but who began associating themselves with God and the religious right when it became expedient.

I refer to the brave people who hold up signs like “God Hates Fags” at political rallies and the spineless ones who sympathize with them. And and of course I refer to the gentle Christian flocks across America who only came to hear of the Separation Clause for the first time a few long years ago when ‘Freedom of Religion…’  was twisted into  “…but not freedom from…”

I refer to the people who ignoring 300 years of American History, suddenly began chanting ‘Christian Nation.’

I refer to the uninformed and well-informed who out of personal insecurity, religious confusion and political expedience, blurred the lines in this great democracy between religion and government.

I refer to those shrill and hysterical voices who would when asked to SHUT UP, thrust their morality-powered, religion shields before all the world and cry victim, quote Hitler and claim discrimination and bigotry until they turn purple.

This is not about religion at all. This is about posers and monsters who have sacrificed whatever grace religion had in this country and pimped it for political power.

OFF With Their Heads!

Peace, Cliff

This follows Okelberries final response archived below the fold. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , ,


Peculiar People

When I was growing up, a popular theme in church was the fact that we were a ‘peculiar people’, indicating a fulfillment of prophecy. What a lot of Mormons are not aware of is that Gordon B. Hinckley’s life’s work was to change all that. He understood that if the church seemed peculiar, it just made missionary work that much harder. You might call him the PR church president.

But it seems the rank and file of the church are not helping. A new book by LDS author Dr. Gary Lawrence shows why Hinckley, if not literally inspired, was certainly right. The Mormon church suffers from terrible negatives, and surprisingly, it has nothing to do with negative publicity about Mitt Romney or California’s Prop 8 so much as, well, people just don’t like them and because of “what are perceived as weird beliefs and secretiveness”.

Thirty-seven percent [of those surveyed] have a favorable impression of us and 49 percent have an unfavorable impression”. . .

It’s even worse when compared with how Americans view other religions. The ratio for people who view those of the Jewish faith in a positive light is nearly 3.5-to-1; the same for Baptists. Catholics’ enjoy a positive ratio of nearly 2-to-1; Mormons, less than 1-to-1.

“Thirty-seven percent of all Americans do not know a Mormon, 55 percent of all Americans do not know an active Mormon.

And probably the most telling fact of all:

. . . those who know one Mormon have a worse opinion of us than those who don’t know any Mormons,” Lawrence said.

Here in Utah, there is a lot of denial about this. Commenters on this blog have said that bad PR is a GOOD thing for the church (kind of a twist on there’s no such thing as bad press, just spell the name right).

And before you attack me for hating the Mormon church (I don’t, but you won’t believe that), I’m just the messenger here. Here’s a suggestion: Don’t make every relationship about spreading the gospel. Try being friendly and interested in neighbors, co-workers, and even strangers just out of a simple love for and appreciation of people of the non-Mormon variety.

, ,


%d bloggers like this: